"Being completely full of it can assume the level of high art." - W. Berry
"...overrated." - M. Phelps
"You basically have no clue what you're talking about." - T.Tam
"This...is so bad I didn't even consider it." - Anonymous
"Your personal attack has been duly noted." - Anonymous Greg
"You have departed from reality." - J. Gallant
"...I was put off by the variety of topics..." - H. Reed
"Your blog...should not be read." - L.E. Product
"It makes me angry!" - S. Pawn
"You're kind of all over the place." - M.Kaprielian
"Bummer." - Anonymous Greg
"I read your blog and read and read, and finally I just said...I don't get it." - B.Brown
"Honestly, who cares?" - Nick
"Your [sic] a dumb*ss" - Anonymous
I vote for #5, but how do you know which good movies I haven’t seen yet? :)
I was very tempted to vote for #6, just to see what kind of post you’d come up with.
But we’ll go with #2.
I’d like to see some reassembling, so I’m voting for “Running with the debatable value of a link sock.”
Isn’t #4 a contradiction in terms? Isn’t the condition of trying “too hard to win” bad by definition, which makes it impossible for it to be debateable. Or do you have something sly up your sleeve?
You can’t trick me into giving it away yet.
#2 sounds tempting, especially when compared to running without your belly.
I don’t want to try TOO hard to win this…but number 4 really sounds informative. ( crosses fingers, hopes in anticipation, creates shrine of failed games where he tried too hard)
#4 please
running with your belly. i’d like to know if it will help my aching knees.
#4 sounds like fun.
Even if I’m the only one to vote for it: #3. There is not enough of it in the chess blogosphere. Hmmm, maybe I should write that post and you can concentrate on #4.
I’d vote for #6, but the language isn’t strong enough.
USCF elections: 11% turnout
US elections: 50% turnout
North Korean elections: 100% turnout
Reassembler elections: priceless
:)
Just back from a long business trip. Didn’t mean to attempt great suspense regarding next post, which will now be a terrific anticlimax.
“Slater stuns readers with sudden comeback” — espn.com
Link love post! ‘Round the Chess Blogosphere Highlights + Hot Chess Babes!
OK, so Wahrheit took #3. Mind if I take #6?
Wahrheit – you da man. Will get back to you on that. p.s., I note that “popchess” ripped off your post. Ain’t that ironic.
LEP – Please do. That would be fun.